The U.S. Open’s top 10 players for peak performance

Arnold Palmer hoists the 1960 Hickok Belt over his head during a banquet at the Powers Hotel in Rochester on Jan. 23, 1961. Palmer won the award over boxer Floyd Patterson.1960 Rocbrd 09 27 2016 Dandc 1 D001 2016 09 26 Img Preferred Photo 1 1 U7frqujk L889792177 Img Preferred Photo 1 1 U7frqujk
Arnold Palmer hoists the 1960 Hickok Belt over his head during a banquet at the Powers Hotel in Rochester on Jan. 23, 1961. Palmer won the award over boxer Floyd Patterson.1960 Rocbrd 09 27 2016 Dandc 1 D001 2016 09 26 Img Preferred Photo 1 1 U7frqujk L889792177 Img Preferred Photo 1 1 U7frqujk /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
4 of 11
Next
Gene Sarazen (left) with Walter Hagen. (Photo by Keystone/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)
Gene Sarazen (left) with Walter Hagen. (Photo by Keystone/Hulton Archive/Getty Images) /

8. Gene Sarazen, -1.48 peak (1923-1932)

Sarazen won two Opens – in 1922 and 1932 – but since they came 11 years apart only one can fit within a 10-year peak window.

It happens that Sarazen’s stronger peak was between 1923 and 1932, a decade during which he seven times finished among the top 10, and only once was outside the top 20.

Already an Open champ and a multiple Major winner thanks to his victories in the 1922 and 1923 PGA,  Sarazen scored four top 5s in a five-year period between 1925 and 1929. He tied for third behind Bobby Jones in 1926, was third again to Tommy Armour in 1927 and tied for third a third time – and a second time behind Jones — in 1929.

His biggest moment came at New York City’s Fresh Meadow in 1932, where Sarazen had formerly been the club pro. He came to the event hot, having won the British Open a few weeks earlier. Five behind Philip Perkins midway through the Saturday morning round, he went on the attack. A final round 66 buried Perkins and Bobby Cruickshank by three strokes, giving Sarazen the win with a score that was 2.72 standard deviations better than the field.

Statistically, it was the most dominant U.S. Open performance since Alex Smith had won at 2.73 standard deviations better than the field average way back in 1906.