The U.S. Open’s top 10 players for peak performance

Arnold Palmer hoists the 1960 Hickok Belt over his head during a banquet at the Powers Hotel in Rochester on Jan. 23, 1961. Palmer won the award over boxer Floyd Patterson.1960 Rocbrd 09 27 2016 Dandc 1 D001 2016 09 26 Img Preferred Photo 1 1 U7frqujk L889792177 Img Preferred Photo 1 1 U7frqujk
Arnold Palmer hoists the 1960 Hickok Belt over his head during a banquet at the Powers Hotel in Rochester on Jan. 23, 1961. Palmer won the award over boxer Floyd Patterson.1960 Rocbrd 09 27 2016 Dandc 1 D001 2016 09 26 Img Preferred Photo 1 1 U7frqujk L889792177 Img Preferred Photo 1 1 U7frqujk /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
8 of 11
Next
Jack Nicklaus in 1972. (Photo by Martin Mills/Getty Images)
Jack Nicklaus in 1972. (Photo by Martin Mills/Getty Images) /

4. Jack Nicklaus, -1.57 peak (1971-1980)

Like Woods’ rating, Nicklaus’ rank as only the U.S. Open’s fourth best player for peak performance is probably surprising. After all, he won four Open championships.

As much as anything, his standing is a testament to the three guys ahead of him. It also has to do with how long Nicklaus was successful: His four titles covered an 18-year span, with no more than two of them encompassing the same 10-year peak.

Statistically, Nicklaus’ Open prime came between 1971 and 1980. He won twice during that decade: 1972 at Pebble Beach and 1980 at Baltusrol.

The remarkable thing about the  1970s version of Nicklaus was his consistency. Never during that decade did he finish worse than 11th in an Open. He was a playoff loser to Lee Trevino in 1971 and tied for fourth behind Johnny Miller at Oakmont in 1973.

Perhaps what costs Nicklaus an even higher spot on the list is his failure to mount more serious challenges during the 1970s. Although a top 10 finisher nine times during that decade, the aforementioned four top fives were his only finishes above sixth.

For the decade as a whole, his average finish was 3.5 strokes behind the champion, with no finishes more than 10 strokes off the winning pace.

That’s very good. There is, however, better.