Who Thrived and Who Suffered Because of Their Zurich Classic Partnership?
By Bill Felber
Who played the best?
On the official scoreboard, Schauffele and Cantlay shared the trophy and first-place check. But when all the birdies, eagles, and bogeys are re-credited to the guys who actually were responsible for them, the order of finish looks a lot different. Here’s a list you’ll never see; the Zurich Classic top 10 if the event were played in an individual, rather than a partnership, format. Their partners of the 10 leaders — along with the team’s actual finish– are both indicated in parenthesis
Player (Partner) Score
1 Bubba Watson (Harold Varner III, T4) -17.0
2 Dylan Wu (Justin Lower, T10) -16.3
3 Patrick Cantlay (Xander Schauffele, 1) -15.8
4 Keegan Bradley (Brendan Steele, T4) -14.6
4 Taylor Moore (Matthew NeSmith, T4) -14.6
6 Garrick Higgo (Branden Grace, T4) -14.3
7 Doc Redman (Sam Ryder, 3) -13.8
8 Will Zalatoris (Davis Riley, T4) -13.6
9 David Lipsky (Aaron Rai, T4) -13.6
10 Sam Burns (Billy Horschel, 2) -13.5
10 Billy Horschel (Sam Burns, 2) -13.5
Only the Burns-Horschel team shared tenancy among the top 10 individual players. Almost all the other top individual players, to a greater or lesser extent, carried their partners or – if you prefer – were held back by them.
When you begin to translate these results into dollar-and-cents terms, the difference between a functioning and non-functioning partnership becomes clearer.
By joining a six-way tie for fourth, the partnership of Watson and Varner should expect to pick up about $200,000 each. But based on how he played, if Watson had only found a more productive partner he might easily have won the event and claimed a winner’s check that will likely surpass $1.2 million when the final accounting is made.
The same can be said for Wu, who would have contended for a breakthrough win either with a better partner or a standard event format. As it is, he and Lower tied for 10th, probably earning them around $100,000.